<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: inkdick: october 13 2008 - calvin at the cross</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/?p=227#comment-947</guid>
		<description>Pranas do a strip about gay abortion next</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pranas do a strip about gay abortion next</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pranas t. naujokaitis</title>
		<link>http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>pranas t. naujokaitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/?p=227#comment-946</guid>
		<description>Oh man, look at Showtime and MacArthur discussing this. That's beautiful, man. Things like this are making me start to wonder if I should create an online forum for all my readers to interact on and further have discussions like the one above. Hmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, look at Showtime and MacArthur discussing this. That&#8217;s beautiful, man. Things like this are making me start to wonder if I should create an online forum for all my readers to interact on and further have discussions like the one above. Hmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacArthur</title>
		<link>http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>MacArthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/?p=227#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Christian copyright infringement is actually legal.  Though I disagree with showtime's reactionary tone and wishy/washy apologetics, and his nonsensical tying of socialism to every point for some reason, and the fact that there's no such thing as "hitlerism," I have to say that human brutality will out despite the circumstances.  Religion, organized or not, is just an extremely effective outlet.

Atheism is actually a very cut and dry umbrella term that includes agnosticism.  Are you absolutely, without a doubt, wholly convinced by arguments that a god exists?  If not, you are an atheist.  The degree, from anywhere to being absolutely certain there is no god (strong atheism, or anti-theism) to varying degrees of agnosticism/uncertainty.  Atheism is not a dogma.  It has no creed, no moral dictates, no lifestyle guide, nothing to say on the subject of taking action.  It is a position on supernatural belief, and tying the horror Stalinist Russia to a simple "they killed them because they were atheists" is misleading, if not outright incorrect.  Also, although historians cannot know the true nature of Hitler's belief or unbelief (he goes back and forth in public statements and journal entires) but he never renounced his Roman Catholocism, and his regime has the tacit support of the Vatican.  But that's just to clarify.
I'm not interested in this game of "who killed more," because it's not a worthwhile question, and doesn't really convince people of either position.  It's kind of a red herring in the debate of what position is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian copyright infringement is actually legal.  Though I disagree with showtime&#8217;s reactionary tone and wishy/washy apologetics, and his nonsensical tying of socialism to every point for some reason, and the fact that there&#8217;s no such thing as &#8220;hitlerism,&#8221; I have to say that human brutality will out despite the circumstances.  Religion, organized or not, is just an extremely effective outlet.</p>
<p>Atheism is actually a very cut and dry umbrella term that includes agnosticism.  Are you absolutely, without a doubt, wholly convinced by arguments that a god exists?  If not, you are an atheist.  The degree, from anywhere to being absolutely certain there is no god (strong atheism, or anti-theism) to varying degrees of agnosticism/uncertainty.  Atheism is not a dogma.  It has no creed, no moral dictates, no lifestyle guide, nothing to say on the subject of taking action.  It is a position on supernatural belief, and tying the horror Stalinist Russia to a simple &#8220;they killed them because they were atheists&#8221; is misleading, if not outright incorrect.  Also, although historians cannot know the true nature of Hitler&#8217;s belief or unbelief (he goes back and forth in public statements and journal entires) but he never renounced his Roman Catholocism, and his regime has the tacit support of the Vatican.  But that&#8217;s just to clarify.<br />
I&#8217;m not interested in this game of &#8220;who killed more,&#8221; because it&#8217;s not a worthwhile question, and doesn&#8217;t really convince people of either position.  It&#8217;s kind of a red herring in the debate of what position is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Yoder</title>
		<link>http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>David Yoder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/?p=227#comment-930</guid>
		<description>It should have been Calvin peeing on the cross and Hobbes dressed up as Judas.

David Yoder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should have been Calvin peeing on the cross and Hobbes dressed up as Judas.</p>
<p>David Yoder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/?p=227#comment-925</guid>
		<description>It's hard for me to decide which I enjoy more: Pranas' strips or show time's comments about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard for me to decide which I enjoy more: Pranas&#8217; strips or show time&#8217;s comments about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: show time</title>
		<link>http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>show time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/?p=227#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Err... Islamic terrorism is not due to "organized islam", in the sense of a unified islamic doctrine with a bit of hierarchic structure. Actually, islam is a problematic religion because it is highly democratic, where bands of people can run on their own under the name of islam, and there is no real hierarchic boss to stop them. Islamic terrorists are the same as socialist terrorists.

Crusaders was half a popular phenomenon and half a civilization-wide semi-official semi-unofficial reaction to the rise of islamic empires. You can view it as greco-roman socialists battling arabo-turkish socialists, with symbolic reference points that inspired those who needed symbols for themselves or to counter others, and helped concretize expeditions.

Religious organization wise, except for the extremes?, their voter ratio seems 5:5 or 4:6 for reps:dems... Republican party is a legitimate wing of American democracy... Democratic enthusistas should perhaps seriously consider secession/splitting the federation in half, or moving out, cause 50% will remain Republican for quite some time, if not forever, looking at the lack of development in American political ideology...

That said, I'm not a fan of overzealous christianity or any other religion, whether they have a history of violence or not. I'm also against buddhism, especially the ones misinterpreted by new age wannabes, and against atheism... Atheism is largely a terminological illusion. Agnostic is often the more accurate term, misleading too. And damn, atheism-thought-to-bes has killed more than the islamic terrorists and crusaders.

Hello Stalinism, Maoism, Hiterlism. Godless populistic rationalist planning states done a hell of a job killing. Both extremes suck. And its not about organized religion, but either populistic spiritual laziness/stagnation/reliance on a static interpretation of the world and ethics, or individualistic imagination running out of control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err&#8230; Islamic terrorism is not due to &#8220;organized islam&#8221;, in the sense of a unified islamic doctrine with a bit of hierarchic structure. Actually, islam is a problematic religion because it is highly democratic, where bands of people can run on their own under the name of islam, and there is no real hierarchic boss to stop them. Islamic terrorists are the same as socialist terrorists.</p>
<p>Crusaders was half a popular phenomenon and half a civilization-wide semi-official semi-unofficial reaction to the rise of islamic empires. You can view it as greco-roman socialists battling arabo-turkish socialists, with symbolic reference points that inspired those who needed symbols for themselves or to counter others, and helped concretize expeditions.</p>
<p>Religious organization wise, except for the extremes?, their voter ratio seems 5:5 or 4:6 for reps:dems&#8230; Republican party is a legitimate wing of American democracy&#8230; Democratic enthusistas should perhaps seriously consider secession/splitting the federation in half, or moving out, cause 50% will remain Republican for quite some time, if not forever, looking at the lack of development in American political ideology&#8230;</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m not a fan of overzealous christianity or any other religion, whether they have a history of violence or not. I&#8217;m also against buddhism, especially the ones misinterpreted by new age wannabes, and against atheism&#8230; Atheism is largely a terminological illusion. Agnostic is often the more accurate term, misleading too. And damn, atheism-thought-to-bes has killed more than the islamic terrorists and crusaders.</p>
<p>Hello Stalinism, Maoism, Hiterlism. Godless populistic rationalist planning states done a hell of a job killing. Both extremes suck. And its not about organized religion, but either populistic spiritual laziness/stagnation/reliance on a static interpretation of the world and ethics, or individualistic imagination running out of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/?p=227#comment-919</guid>
		<description>McDonalds again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McDonalds again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffalobelle</title>
		<link>http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>buffalobelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/?p=227#comment-918</guid>
		<description>The lawyers jump on everything else; I can imagine them letting go of this one.  Where are the guys who write up the protection laws?  How far do we go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawyers jump on everything else; I can imagine them letting go of this one.  Where are the guys who write up the protection laws?  How far do we go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/2008/10/13/inkdick-october-13-2008-calvin-at-the-cross/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostcarpress.com/inkdick/?p=227#comment-916</guid>
		<description>nothing says christian like trade mark infringement!
i read an interview with watterson that mentioned the calving peeing stickers, and basically he didn't take action soon enough, so he no longer has a case.  which basically means (if i understood it correctly) that at this point, anyone can use calvin for that sort of thing and he can't do anything about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nothing says christian like trade mark infringement!<br />
i read an interview with watterson that mentioned the calving peeing stickers, and basically he didn&#8217;t take action soon enough, so he no longer has a case.  which basically means (if i understood it correctly) that at this point, anyone can use calvin for that sort of thing and he can&#8217;t do anything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

